Seoyeon Hur (South Korea)

Seoyeon
Hur (South Korea) - PhD student at Kangwon National University
Do we act, if we know? (Presentation)
Presentation Language: English
In
this presentation, I aim to show the unconsciousness in Freud can be understood
as the Unauthenticity in Heidegger. Unconsciousness is a key concept in Freud's
early thought and is considered a source of psychopathic phenomena. But Swiss
psychiatrist Boss criticizes Freud's concept of unconsciousness as a limit to
natural-scientific thinking separating subject and object. My attempt to
understand the unconsciousness based on Heidegger's philosophy will open
hopefully the way for the widespread use of Heidegger's concept of
Unauthenticity in philosophical counseling. The discussion proceeds in four
steps as follows. 1) Freud's psychoanalysis presupposes the concept of truth as
unconcealedness. In other words, human beings are not the union of the isolated
mind and body as in natural science but the Dasein, who is disclosed to the
world and gives meaning to other beings. 2) Freud's meaning is not related to
causality, but to the temporality of Dasein. Because the 'understanding',
through that the Dasein thrown by the past throws itself on the future
possibilities, is the 'giving-meaning'. 3) Understanding of Dasein also
indicates the freedom of the Dasein. For the Dasein is always freely present as
a possibility. Here the concepts of authenticity and unauthenticity are
explained as the possibilities of Dasein. 4) Freud's language is not any symbol
attached to meaning. It is a way of unconcealing a concealed being in oblivion
or suppression. The debate eventually converges on the unconcealedness and
concealdeness, the authenticity and unauthenticity of the Dasein. It will be
revealed here that Freud's unconsciousness concept can be explained by
Heidegger's unauthenticity concept.